← All BCH Flashcard Decks

Trance Depth Assessment Flashcards

7 cards from real BCH practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Trance Depth Assessment flashcards as text
  1. Which behavioral indicator best distinguishes a medium trance from a light trance?

    Answer: Catalepsy of the dominant hand

    Catalepsy — rigid immobility of a limb — is a hallmark of medium trance and is not typically present in light trance states.

  2. A client in the Davis-Husband scale at level 6 would MOST likely demonstrate which response?

    Answer: Partial limb catalepsy

    Level 6 on the Davis-Husband scale corresponds to partial catalepsy, a mid-range trance phenomenon.

  3. The Elman Induction is designed to achieve what depth within the first few minutes?

    Answer: Somnambulism

    Dave Elman's rapid induction protocol targets somnambulism because most therapeutic phenomena require that depth.

  4. Which cue would a hypnotist MOST rely upon to confirm eye catalepsy without a verbal challenge?

    Answer: Noticing eyelid flutter ceasing and lids appearing 'glued'

    Visual observation of still, 'glued-looking' eyelids with no flutter indicates eye catalepsy without disrupting the trance.

  5. In trance depth assessment, 'arm levitation' is typically classified as a phenomenon of which depth range?

    Answer: Medium trance

    Arm levitation is an ideomotor response that reliably appears in the medium trance range on most standard scales.

  6. A subject who spontaneously forgets post-hypnotic suggestions without a specific amnesia instruction is most likely in which state?

    Answer: Somnambulistic trance

    Spontaneous amnesia — forgetting without explicit suggestion — is a characteristic marker of somnambulistic depth.

  7. Which statement about subjective depth scales is MOST accurate for a BCH practitioner?

    Answer: They provide self-report data that should be cross-checked with behavioral indicators

    Subjective scales offer valuable client perspective but must be validated against observable behavioral signs for clinical accuracy.