AWA Crafting Effective Conclusions 3

Question 1

What distinguishes a 'call to action' conclusion from a 'implication' conclusion in AWA essays?

Accepted Answer

A call to action urges specific steps; an implication draws out broader consequences

Answer

A call to action directs what should be done next, while an implication explores what the analysis means in a wider context.

Question 2

An AWA writer ends their essay: 'Without addressing these logical gaps, the argument cannot be taken seriously.' This conclusion is best described as:

Accepted Answer

Appropriately direct, summarizing the essay's critical stance

Answer

This conclusion clearly reflects the analytical purpose of the Argument essay by reiterating that the reasoning is flawed overall.

Question 3

Why should an AWA conclusion avoid introducing entirely new evidence?

Accepted Answer

It undermines the essay's structure by raising unanswered questions at the end

Answer

Introducing new evidence at the end leaves readers with unresolved questions and signals poor organizational planning.

Question 4

Which sentence most effectively closes an Issue essay arguing for stricter environmental regulations?

Accepted Answer

Stricter regulations, while imperfect, represent the most pragmatic path toward sustainable economic growth for future generations.

Answer

This sentence synthesizes the argument, acknowledges nuance, and elevates the discussion to a broader significance.

Question 5

In the AWA Analyze an Argument task, the conclusion should NOT:

Accepted Answer

Argue that the prompt's conclusion is definitely correct or definitely wrong

Answer

The Argument task asks you to analyze reasoning, not to pass judgment on whether the underlying claim is true or false.

(AWA) Analytical Writing Assessment Practice Test

(AWA) Analytical Writing Assessment Practice Test

AWA Crafting Effective Conclusions 3