ASEP Technical Reviews and Audits 2

Question 1

Entry criteria for a formal technical review typically require:

Accepted Answer

Availability of required review artifacts with products meeting minimum maturity standards

Answer

Customer signature approval of all review package documents in advance

Answer

Completion of all action items generated during the previous major review

Answer

Successful completion of all planned integration and testing activities

Question 2

Exit criteria for a technical review are best described as:

Accepted Answer

Conditions that must be satisfied before the review is formally closed and the program can proceed

Answer

The complete list of all action items generated and assigned during the review

Answer

Documentation archiving requirements for storing formal review records

Answer

The follow-up schedule for activities to be completed after the review

Question 3

In the context of technical reviews, 'action items' (sometimes called RIDs, TBDs, or TBRs) are:

Accepted Answer

Issues or discrepancies identified during review that must be resolved and tracked to closure

Answer

Pre-planned agenda tasks assigned to presenters before the review meeting

Answer

Required deliverable documents that must be submitted prior to the review

Answer

Routine administrative tasks assigned to support the review documentation process

Question 4

Which configuration audit specifically confirms that the as-built configuration of each configuration item matches the approved product baseline documentation?

Accepted Answer

Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

Answer

Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)

Answer

Production Readiness Review (PRR)

Answer

System Configuration Review (SCR)

Question 5

The primary purpose of a peer review in systems engineering is to:

Accepted Answer

Identify defects, issues, and improvement opportunities in work products through structured colleague examination

Answer

Assess program cost and schedule performance against the baseline plan

Answer

Replace formal milestone reviews when program changes are minor in scope

Answer

Provide the customer with visibility into technical progress and design maturity

Question 6

The Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) is typically conducted:

Accepted Answer

After system fabrication is complete and before delivery to the customer

Answer

At the beginning of the detailed design phase to establish the product baseline

Answer

During the preliminary design phase to validate early design decisions

Answer

Before system integration begins to verify component documentation

Question 7

Which formal review serves as the decision gate that authorizes transition from preliminary design to detailed design activities?

Accepted Answer

Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

Answer

System Requirements Review (SRR)

Answer

Critical Design Review (CDR)

Answer

System Design Review (SDR)