AIC Negotiation & Settlement Techniques 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which negotiation strategy involves making an initial offer significantly higher or lower than the expected settlement to anchor the other party's expectations?
- Bracketing
- Anchoring (Correct answer)
- Mirroring
- Nibbling
Correct answer: Anchoring
Anchoring is the tactic of placing an extreme initial offer to establish a reference point that influences the final settlement amount.
Question 2: In claims negotiation, a 'reservation point' refers to:
- The date a claim is reserved in the system
- The maximum or minimum value at which a party will walk away from negotiations (Correct answer)
- A hold placed on settlement funds
- The mediator's recommended settlement range
Correct answer: The maximum or minimum value at which a party will walk away from negotiations
A reservation point (also called a walk-away point) is the threshold beyond which a party would prefer no agreement over a bad deal.
Question 3: A BATNA in claims settlement negotiations stands for:
- Best Achievable Terms in Negotiated Agreement
- Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (Correct answer)
- Basic Approach To Neutral Arbitration
- Binding Arbitration Terms in Negligence Actions
Correct answer: Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) defines the strongest option a party has if negotiations fail, setting the floor for acceptable settlements.
Question 4: When a claimant demands $50,000 and the adjuster offers $20,000, and both parties agree to split the difference at $35,000, this is an example of:
- Principled negotiation
- Bracketing
- Compromising via midpoint settlement (Correct answer)
- Integrative bargaining
Correct answer: Compromising via midpoint settlement
Splitting the difference is a compromising strategy where both parties agree to settle at the mathematical midpoint between their stated positions.
Question 5: Which of the following best describes 'integrative bargaining' in a claims context?
- Each party gives up something to reach agreement
- Parties work together to find creative solutions that expand value for both sides (Correct answer)
- The adjuster integrates all claim data before making an offer
- A mediator integrates both parties' positions into a final award
Correct answer: Parties work together to find creative solutions that expand value for both sides
Integrative bargaining (win-win negotiation) seeks to expand the pie by addressing underlying interests rather than rigid positions, creating solutions beneficial to both parties.
Question 6: When documenting a negotiated settlement, which element is most critical to include to protect the insurer from future claims arising from the same incident?
- The claimant's signature date
- A full and final release of all claims (Correct answer)
- The adjuster's claim reserve amount
- The subrogation waiver clause
Correct answer: A full and final release of all claims
A full and final release ensures the claimant cannot bring future claims for the same loss, providing the insurer complete legal protection after settlement.
Question 7: An adjuster is negotiating a bodily injury claim. The claimant's attorney presents a demand package with medical specials of $10,000. Using the 'multiplier method,' a reasonable general damages estimate at 3x specials would be:
- $10,000
- $20,000
- $30,000 (Correct answer)
- $40,000
Correct answer: $30,000
The multiplier method estimates general damages (pain and suffering) by multiplying economic damages (specials) by a factor, commonly 2–5x; 3x $10,000 = $30,000.
Which negotiation strategy involves making an initial offer significantly higher or lower than the expected settlement to anchor the other party's expectations?