Cost Estimating Methodologies Flashcards
6 cards from real ACAP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Cost Estimating Methodologies flashcards as text
What are the four primary cost estimating methodologies recognized in DoD cost analysis?
Answer: Analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, and expert opinion
DoD cost estimating guidance identifies these four core methods, each suited to different data availability conditions and program maturity levels.
What is the 'learning curve' concept and how is it applied in Army cost estimating?
Answer: As cumulative production quantity doubles, unit cost decreases by a fixed percentage, reflecting worker efficiency gains and process improvements
The learning curve (or progress curve) models the well-documented phenomenon that unit production labor hours decline predictably with cumulative production, reducing per-unit costs at higher quantities.
What is an 'engineering build-up' estimate and when is it most appropriate?
Answer: A bottoms-up estimate built from detailed labor, material, and overhead costs for each component; most appropriate when design is mature and detailed technical data are available
Engineering build-up is the most detailed method and requires a mature design, but produces high-fidelity estimates by aggregating costs at the lowest WBS levels.
What is a 'Cost Estimating Relationship (CER)' and what data is required to develop one?
Answer: A mathematical equation relating cost to one or more technical or program parameters, developed using regression analysis of historical cost and technical data
CERs are derived through statistical regression of historical data, with cost as the dependent variable and technical characteristics (weight, power, speed) as independent variables.
What is the 'coefficient of determination (R²)' and what does it indicate about a CER?
Answer: It measures the proportion of variance in cost explained by the independent variable(s); a higher R² indicates a better statistical fit
R² ranges from 0 to 1; an R² of 0.90 means 90% of the variability in cost is explained by the CER, with a higher value indicating a more reliable relationship.
In the analogy method, what is 'complexity factor' adjustment?
Answer: A multiplier applied to the reference system's cost to account for differences in technical difficulty between the analog and the new system
When the new system is more or less complex than the analog, a complexity factor adjusts the analog cost proportionally to reflect the estimated cost impact of that difference.