Free TN Bar Ethical Issues in the Legal Profession Questions and Answers — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which of the following is considered a violation of the duty of competence?
- Representing a client in a complex matter without sufficient preparation (Correct answer)
- Charging a higher fee for more complex cases
- Referring a client to a more experienced lawyer
- Taking on a case in an unfamiliar area of law but conducting thorough research
Correct answer: Representing a client in a complex matter without sufficient preparation
If a lawyer knows that their client intends to testify falsely in court, the proper ethical action is to advise the client against testifying falsely and, if necessary, withdraw from the case. A lawyer cannot knowingly offer false evidence or assist a client in committing perjury. If withdrawal is not possible, the lawyer may have to take remedial measures, potentially including disclosure to the tribunal, depending on the jurisdiction's rules.
Question 2: What is the proper action for a lawyer if they know that their client intends to testify falsely in court?
- Allow the client to testify and correct the record later
- Prevent the client from testifying
- Advise the client against testifying and if necessary, withdraw from the case (Correct answer)
- Inform the judge immediately
Correct answer: Advise the client against testifying and if necessary, withdraw from the case
A lawyer can charge a contingent fee primarily in civil cases where the fee is based on the outcome of the matter. This means the lawyer's fee is a percentage of the amount recovered for the client. Contingent fees are generally prohibited in criminal cases and certain domestic relations matters, as they can create conflicts of interest or undermine public policy.
Question 3: Under what circumstances can a lawyer charge a contingent fee?
- In any case
- Only in personal injury cases
- In civil cases where the fee is based on the outcome (Correct answer)
- In criminal cases to ensure payment
Correct answer: In civil cases where the fee is based on the outcome
Representing two clients with potentially conflicting interests without obtaining informed consent is a clear ethical violation concerning conflicts of interest. Lawyers have a duty of loyalty to their clients, and a conflict arises when representing one client would be directly adverse to another, or when there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client. Informed consent, confirmed in writing, is typically required to waive such conflicts.
Question 4: Which of the following actions is considered an ethical violation concerning conflicts of interest?
- Representing two clients with potentially conflicting interests without obtaining informed consent (Correct answer)
- Representing clients in unrelated matters
- Referring a client to another lawyer due to a conflict of interest
- Seeking a waiver of the conflict from both clients after full disclosure
Correct answer: Representing two clients with potentially conflicting interests without obtaining informed consent
The primary duty of a lawyer when representing a client is to represent the client zealously within the bounds of the law. This means advocating for the client's interests diligently and competently, while always adhering to ethical rules and legal principles. It balances strong advocacy with the lawyer's obligations to the legal system and the administration of justice.
Question 5: What is the primary duty of a lawyer when representing a client?
- To ensure the lawyer gets paid
- To represent the client zealously within the bounds of the law (Correct answer)
- To guarantee a win for the client
- To follow the client’s instructions without question
Correct answer: To represent the client zealously within the bounds of the law
To represent the client zealously within the bounds of the law. Lawyers must advocate for their clients vigorously while adhering to legal and ethical standards.
Which of the following is considered a violation of the duty of competence?